以我的條件哪種銀行貸款商品利率會比較低?

這裡填表免費諮詢:


LEGITIMIZING THEFT? Panai Kusui, Mayaw Biho, Salone Ishahavut and Lin Fei-fan were among those who gathered to criticize the omission of private landBy Abraham Gerber / Staff reporterFailure to include private land within the government’s legal definition of Aboriginal “traditional areas” will entrench historical oppression and injustice, Aboriginal campaigners said yesterday, blasting the government’s failure to meet its promise of transitional justice.More than a dozen people associated with the Aboriginal Transitional Justice Classroom （原住民轉型正義小教室） gathered on Ketagalan Boulevard in front of the Presidential Office Building and shouted for villages to be allowed to declare their own traditional areas.“Excluding private land amounts to an acknowledgement that the past behavior and policies which led to the theft of Aboriginal land were legitimate,” said Salone Ishahavut, a Bunun and a professor of indigenous development at National Chi Nan University.She said that the 800,000 hectares which the Council of Indigenous Peoples has estimated will be covered under traditional area delineation guidelines published last week is a drastic reduction from the 1.8 million hectares it estimated should be included following a survey completed in 2007.New guidelines restrict application of the “traditional area” label to government-owned land, explicitly excluding private land.While it is not clear what portion of the reduction is attributable to the exclusion of private land, much of the prime real estate in traditional areas is now in private hands, Salone said.“While this delineation of traditional areas was supposed to be about protecting our land rights, excluding privately owned land will mean the final and complete loss of original lands and their related memories,” she said.Including privately owned land in the “traditional areas” would give Aboriginals a voice in development projects, while leaving formal ownership unchanged, she said.“This policy is effectively saying that the system of private property can address many delicate questions and complicated processes,” said Lin Fei-fan （林飛帆）, a Sunflower movement leader.Lin said the council is using its administrative discretion to avoid tackling difficult aspects of transitional justice.“Traditional areas should refer to the real-life space of our ancestors, but the council is focusing on the ‘status quo,’ which has already diverged from tradition. These delineation rules amount to an acknowledgement that our nation is unable to face the real history of indigenous peoples,” Amis singer-activist Panai Kusui said.Including private land would spotlight the injustices involved in its acquisition, and could spark a national conversation, she said.Another Amis, Mayaw Biho, a documentary filmmaker and a former head of Taiwan Indigenous TV, said the government has failed to follow through with promises to push for indigenous transitional justice in parallel with transitional justice efforts aimed at other abuses under Chinese Nationalist Party （KMT） authoritarian rule.“The Presidential Office committee on indigenous justice held its first meeting in December [last year] and that was just an initial meeting which did not result in anything — but just look at all the Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee has been doing,” Mayaw said.新聞來源：TAIPEI TIMES

2017-台北代書借款0台灣民間借貸土地貸款成數2貸款條件查詢南山人壽房貸利率2017內政部青年首次購屋優惠房貸2017貸款融資貸款代辦公司a台新信用貸款台中支票借款土地貸款利息>土地貸款銀行低息私人貸款土地銀行公教信用貸款-台新整合負債台中民間借貸貸款買車a台南小額借款貸款比較>農地持分貸款2403:00第一銀行信貸台中民間貸款台中民間信貸

台南汽機車借款推薦房貸轉貸的銀行台中支票貼現a農地抵押貸款當鋪借錢土地銀行勞工低利貸款土地貸款利率>台中市借錢>台北借錢網台北民間二胎>台北哪裡可以借錢土銀房貸試算
650143FD17A6F863
arrow
arrow
    文章標籤
    貸款試算excel 農會貸款程序 代書信貸20萬 土地貸款銀行 台南民間借款
    全站熱搜

    Cirritzer711 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

    E-mail轉寄